Everything that is of high value to us is extremely easy to find in space because they are in near infinite quantities.
***What about the cost of the exploration/discovery and then the cost of transporting from space to where we can use these materials?
Because of that, ( if we bring the valuable treasures down to Earth ) private industries can make more money off of metals and minerals to help advertise, pay for the costly trips, get newer, updated technology ( to require the safety standards needed and to just be safe. ), and get needed supplies for the trips. Since President Obama has a budget of about 18.6 billion dollars, that will help the private industries to reach their goal. Every cent counts in order to explore and learn about our solar system.
*How much (percentage?) of that 18.6 billion dollars is directed to NASA?
NOTE: The purple text is Ms. Baker, suggesting what an opponent might say in response to your reasons - be ready to ANSWER BACK to these "attacks." Response - NASA gets about 9.928 billion dollars a year on average. The 2011 budget was 18.4 billion dollars, about 0.5 % of the US Federal budget (3.4 trillion dollars) . About 35 % of the money was used for advanced research.
Private industries are obviously going to advertise their products, that's for sure. BUT, if the products aren't good for you or aren't well made, that could lead in a loss of money for the industry. IF** the product is extremely popular, then many people would want to buy it, resulting in a surplus of money that would support the private industries.
Creating path dependencies are easier to work with in private industry. When the companies develop less expensive ideas, that will ensure quicker investment, which means that there will be more money for them. Because of the products that are so cheap, many people will want to buy them.
The company Boeing and the NASA Kennedy Space Center will bring more than 100 jobs to Florida's Space Coast. Many people lost thier jobs in 2011 due to the space shuttle program ending. They are supposed to create 140 new jobs by 2013, and 550 by December, 2016. This is extremely well for private industries because more people means more ideas, and more ideas equals more products. More products equals more people interested in buying them, and more buying equals more money for the industries! By then, they will have a lot of money to do whatever thay can to help the exploration of space.
A lot of people are on Facebook and Twitter these days, and they update their status A LOT. They also post messages A LOT. So, if people are sciency and they like to hear about space news, then what they hear is probably going to be messaged to all of their friends. One message can go to one person to about five million very quick. If the space news becomes popular, people are going to start wondering about it. Are certain companies advertising it? These people are going to want to buy the industry's products to help support the news, which is more money for the company.
If the industries are handed off from the government, they should be concerned about crashes because they would lose a lot of money to help pay for the crash. That wouldn't be good for the business or the people in the crash! Astronauts take risks every day for us, and sometimes that's what results from it. If they take risks, why shouldn't private industries? They can take risks. If astronauts do somethind daring that could possibly lead up to pure destruction of the money that the company owns (like Felix Baumgartener's jump) , it will jeopardize the company. We won't know until we try. Plus, we could get businessmen to go to clinics or training for a better economy that would support the industries.
Everything that is of high value to us is extremely easy to find in space because they are in near infinite quantities.
***What about the cost of the exploration/discovery and then the cost of transporting from space to where we can use these materials?
Because of that, ( if we bring the valuable treasures down to Earth ) private industries can make more money off of metals and minerals to help advertise, pay for the costly trips, get newer, updated technology ( to require the safety standards needed and to just be safe. ), and get needed supplies for the trips. Since President Obama has a budget of about 18.6 billion dollars, that will help the private industries to reach their goal. Every cent counts in order to explore and learn about our solar system.
*How much (percentage?) of that 18.6 billion dollars is directed to NASA?NOTE: The purple text is Ms. Baker, suggesting what an opponent might say in response to your reasons - be ready to ANSWER BACK to these "attacks."
Response - NASA gets about 9.928 billion dollars a year on average. The 2011 budget was 18.4 billion dollars, about 0.5 % of the US Federal budget (3.4 trillion dollars) . About 35 % of the money was used for advanced research.
Private industries are obviously going to advertise their products, that's for sure. BUT, if the products aren't good for you or aren't well made, that could lead in a loss of money for the industry. IF** the product is extremely popular, then many people would want to buy it, resulting in a surplus of money that would support the private industries.
Creating path dependencies are easier to work with in private industry. When the companies develop less expensive ideas, that will ensure quicker investment, which means that there will be more money for them. Because of the products that are so cheap, many people will want to buy them.
The company Boeing and the NASA Kennedy Space Center will bring more than 100 jobs to Florida's Space Coast. Many people lost thier jobs in 2011 due to the space shuttle program ending. They are supposed to create 140 new jobs by 2013, and 550 by December, 2016. This is extremely well for private industries because more people means more ideas, and more ideas equals more products. More products equals more people interested in buying them, and more buying equals more money for the industries! By then, they will have a lot of money to do whatever thay can to help the exploration of space.
A lot of people are on Facebook and Twitter these days, and they update their status A LOT. They also post messages A LOT. So, if people are sciency and they like to hear about space news, then what they hear is probably going to be messaged to all of their friends. One message can go to one person to about five million very quick. If the space news becomes popular, people are going to start wondering about it. Are certain companies advertising it? These people are going to want to buy the industry's products to help support the news, which is more money for the company.
If the industries are handed off from the government, they should be concerned about crashes because they would lose a lot of money to help pay for the crash. That wouldn't be good for the business or the people in the crash! Astronauts take risks every day for us, and sometimes that's what results from it. If they take risks, why shouldn't private industries? They can take risks. If astronauts do somethind daring that could possibly lead up to pure destruction of the money that the company owns (like Felix Baumgartener's jump) , it will jeopardize the company. We won't know until we try. Plus, we could get businessmen to go to clinics or training for a better economy that would support the industries.